Logo

Whitepaper

Objective

For the last 100 years certain aspects of technology have been hidden in black projects, patents with key details missing, obvious misdirections, and sometimes in plain sight. This organization will be tasked with: releasing all technology developed to everyone, not just the chosen few; and ensuring that companies and ventures spring up to produce technology developed. We will do this by testing and replicating patents which are already in the public domain, and providing results, schematics, designs, and guides to prospective innovators for production. As a society we must realize we need to leave a better place for our children, so by being open, transparent, and helpful we hope that someone will produce world changing technologies in our collective lifetimes.

Abstract

EVO-Labs DAO is a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) dedicated to advancing research, experimentation, and commercialization of innovative frontier technologiesand theories which may incorporate physics phenomena such as Vacuum Energy, Exotic Vacuum Objects (EVOs) or LENR.

By leveraging blockchain-based decentralized governance, transparent funding mechanisms, and project management via open-source methodologies, EVO-Labs DAO aims to instigate a second industrial revolution by incubating inventors and experimenters who have a desire to create an open source Minimal Viable Product for free and open dissemination via DeSci.

The DAO will run and operate the EVO Labs protocol, which, when combined with our large community, will assist with the creation of breakthrough technologies in fields relating to propulsion, transportation, transmutation, nuclear remediation, manufacturing, energy production, communications and materials processing.

Once a project is complete, all notes, comments, designs, iterations, articles, and forum posts will be bundled, locked, and stored in long term blockchain based data storage for 200 years. Further, a curated article will be generated to be added to our yearly Journal release, as well as quarterly updates.

This whitepaper outlines our mission to build a relentless and resilient ecosystem for scientific innovation.

1. Introduction

1.1 Problems

The field of emerging physics is ripe with potential for breakthroughs that could redefine the way we live our lives, view resources, travel, or utilize energy. However, traditional research ecosystems face many limitations:

1.2 Vision

EVO-Labs DAO envisions a world where scientific exploration is democratized, knowledge is freely shared, and technological breakthroughs are accessible to all. By creating a decentralized platform, EVO Labs, we will enable research funding, project management, peer review, and potential product commercialization. We desire a future where we aid in accelerating humanity's progress in understanding and harnessing exotic physics phenomena.

2. DAO Governance Structure

2.1 Decentralized Governance

EVO-Labs DAO operates as a blockchain-based decentralized organization. Governance is enabled through community voting, facilitated by non-transferable and non exchangeable Soul Bound Tokens (SBT). These tokens grant DAO members the ability to propose, vote on, and oversee projects via peer review, contributing governance without financial incentive.

2.2 Onboarding

We anticipate bad actors and psyops, but we must allow entry to all those who wish to join. However, due to there being a cost involved to mint a DAO Member SBT, we estimate it will reduce the amount of Bots or nefarious individuals willing to disrupt DAO activities.

Entry into the DAO, and minting of the DAO Member SBT Governance token will cost in the region of $10. It will be a one time fee, and users will not need any more than one to interact with the DAO. Any proceeds or donations from this action will go to the DAO Treasury.

2.3 Roles and Credentials

All users who agree with and who sign the Constitution and Community Rules will receive the opportunity to mint a DAO Member SBT. Users may use fiat or crypto for this purchase.

Roles include:

  • DAO Member
  • Expert (multiple industries)
  • Operations
  • Scientific Process Admin
  • Admin
  • Moderator
  • Project Member
  • Project Lead
  • Banned

SBT Credentials can be earned for:

  • Community Peer Reviews
  • Active Community Member (multiple tiers)
  • Donated to Treasury (multiple tiers)
  • Donated to X Project (multiple tiers)
  • Donated to Multiple Projects (multiple tiers)
  • Delegator
  • Delegate

2.4 Proposals

DAO Community members can vote on, and create Proposals based on pre defined templates. These proposals have four categories: Project Application Proposals, Procurement Request Proposals, DAO Community Proposals and Emergency DAO Community Proposals.

2.5 Rubric Voting Mechanism

DAO Community Rubric Vote Interface

The DAO Governance structure will employ two forms of voting for the DAO: Rubric and an on chain Delegated Snapshot. Initial Rubric votes will be conducted by DAO members on all Proposals. They will be off-chain, free, and take 30 days to complete. We will use Rubric voting as it involves assigning scores or ratings across defined dimensions to assess performance or suitability.

2.6 Delegated Voting Mechanism

To ensure expertise-driven decisions, for our on chain voting we will implement vote delegation. This will allow DAO members to delegate their votes to community assigned experts. These experts will receive delegated votes from DAO members to increase their voting power in this decision making process. This allows DAO members to empower others who share their values and vision for the ecosystem to represent them and vote on their behalf.

One concern with vote delegation is the Pareto Distribution. So we will formulate a process where one delegate cannot wield a significant proportion of votes compared to other Delegates. We would aim for DAO members to delegate their votes somewhat equally amongst the Delegates, but we understand human nature so a flexible cap will be employed using a percentage of total delegated votes.

DAO members will be able to change their preferred Delegate at any time, or cast their own vote if they prefer.

2.7 Transparency and Trust

The DAO will have a fully transparent review, and Governance process. We are committed to open grant applications where all completed and legible Project Applications, Procurement Requests, DAO Community Proposals, both actioned and unactioned, will be made public for DAO members to view.

3. DAO Operational Workflows

3.1 Project Application Workflow

DAO Community Rubric Vote Interface

Proposals relating to Projects will originate from the Project Application Form. The DAO does require submissions to have a real world application in mind. This can be a product unto itself, or a measurement device, or method for the development of future products. The DAO adheres to the idea that if it works, then there is a way in which it works. If there is a way in which it works, there are ways in which it doesn't. The border between describes the 'how' in its working.

Esoteric projects aren't a problem per-sé for the DAO, so long as the hypotheses are falsifiable and the project is aimed towards a non-subjective means of measuring the phenomenon and applying it.

Applicants will be asked to qualify relevant parameters, what should happen according to the current scientific paradigm, and what the applicant expects to happen. Further the DAO will require methodologies, details on realistic expectations for commercialization, and budget requirements via milestones. Supporting information, patents, articles, analytical methods, and predictions which need modelling need to be highlighted within the application also.

After a Project Application has been submitted an initial Scientific Process Check will occur. A nominated member of the DAO will inspect the validity and completeness of the Application. If they decide on its merit and legibility, they will proceed by offering Legal documentation to sign, asking the applicant to comply with potential KYC/AML checks (depending on the amounts of funding requested), and onboarded to the DAO if required. This Application will be converted into the Project Application Template.

After the Template is completed and submitted, this will trigger a Rubric vote where criteria will be marked by DAO members. Community feedback, comments, suggestions, and concerns, are to be raised and we aim that this will create an interactive and open review period between the Project Applicant and the DAO Community.

Final totals will be collated and generated into an Application Report after 30 days of inspection. This Report is utilized as data for the basis of the on chain Snapshot vote.

The on chain Snapshot vote will be decided by Delegates, and those who choose not to delegate their SBT token. Voters will be able to assign their preferences over multiple predefined fields indicating whether they approve the funding terms and to proceed, they deny funding, or require more time or information and we need to go back a step. This vote will also allow 30 days for completion. To pass a vote, a two thirds majority in terms of votes cast must be achieved, a super majority.

In total, we will aim to complete the open review process of a Project Application within 60 of the completion of the Project Application Template. The DAO will require a further 14 to 28 days to provide the funding, but will aim to facilitate it within days of the accepted on chain vote.

As a final note, as DeSci becomes more established more grant opportunities will emerge. When we compare our application process to others, our requirements are high enough that we inadvertently gather enough data to populate grant applications from other protocols. Consequently, we will look into ways of maximizing funding via a multitude of funding routes.

3.2 Procurement Request Workflow

DAO Community Rubric Vote Interface

Procurement Requests relating to already funded projects may occur due to unforeseen circumstances, equipment failure or a myriad of reasons. Applications will be made via the Procurement Request template.

After a Procurement Request has been submitted an initial Scientific Process Check will occur. A nominated member of the DAO will inspect the validity and completeness of the Request. If they decide on its merit and legibility, they will proceed by offering Legal documentation to sign, and potentially asking the applicant to comply with KYC/AML checks (depending on the amounts of funding requested).

After the Template is completed and submitted, this will trigger a Rubric vote where criteria will be marked by DAO members. Community feedback, comments, suggestions, and concerns, are to be raised and we aim that this will create an interactive and open review period between the Procurement Request Applicant and the DAO Community.

Final totals will be collated and generated into an Procurement Request Report after 30 days of inspection. This Report is utilized as data for the basis of the on chain Snapshot vote.

The on chain Snapshot vote will be decided by Delegates, and those who choose not to delegate their SBT. Voters will be able to assign their preferences over multiple predefined fields indicating whether they approve the funding terms and to proceed, they deny funding, or require more time or information and we need to go back a step. This vote will also allow 30 days for completion. To pass a vote, a two thirds majority in terms of votes cast must be achieved, a super majority.

In total, we will aim to complete the open review process of a Procurement Request Application within 60 days of completion of the Procurement Request Template. The DAO will require a further 14 to 28 days to provide the funding, but will aim to facilitate it within days of the accepted on chain vote.

3.3 DAO Community Proposal Workflow

DAO Community Rubric Vote Interface

Regarding DAO Community Proposals, SBT holders may request via the template to change any aspect of the DAO. From voting times, to Constitutional amendments, updates to workflows, or suggesting capital allocation for yield opportunities. Any idea a DAO member has can be brought forward and voted on by the community. We highly recommend, however, that DAO members begin discussions of their ideas in the Forum. Once a suitable Community Proposal has been devised, then the template should be filled in and the process started. We do not want the DAO to be bogged down with Community Proposals that have little support or create voter fatigue.

After the Template is completed and submitted, this will trigger a Rubric vote where criteria will be marked by DAO members. Community feedback, comments, suggestions, and concerns, are to be raised and we aim that this will create an interactive and open review period between the DAO Community Proposal Applicant and the DAO Community.

Final totals will be collated and generated into an Community Proposal Report after 30 days of inspection. This Report is utilized as data for the basis of the on chain Snapshot vote.

The on chain Snapshot vote will be decided by Delegates, and those who choose not to delegate their SBT. Voters will be able to assign their preferences over multiple predefined fields indicating whether they approve the funding terms and to proceed, they deny funding, or require more time or information and we need to go back a step. This vote will also allow 30 days for completion. To pass a vote, a two thirds majority in terms of votes cast must be achieved, a super majority.

In total, we will aim to complete the open review process of a DAO Community Proposal Application within 60 days of completion of the DAO Community Proposal Template. The DAO will require a further 14 to 28 days to provide the funding (if required), but will aim to facilitate it within days of the accepted on chain vote.

3.4 Emergency DAO Community Proposal Workflow

DAO Community Rubric Vote Interface

On occasion the DAO will need to do things quickly. An example of this would be a revoking a contract. If the DAO had used a certain protocol and there was a hack which left our funds vulnerable, an Emergency DAO Community Proposal would be enacted. This proposal would take 1 day to be ratified by the community via an on chain Snapshot vote. Another example could be banning users.

3.5 Constitutional Amendment Workflow

Should a Constitutional Amendment be required by the community or the protocol, a DAO Community Proposal will be drafted. To amend the Constitution, the Delegated vote must reach a threshold of 75% to be enacted. This will ensure that a broad consensus is reached, that hasty or divisive changes are not made, prevents frequent alterations, enforces serious consideration of all amendments, and aligns the DAO with decentralized principles.

4. Operational Support

The type of support required at different stages of a projects lifecycle will vary. Further, should applicants require assistance with various aspects of Project Management, writing risk assessments, or constructing technical or scientific documents, the DAO's Operations team will assist with skill gaps and offer educational documentation. Projects may also apply to the DAO for Operational support only, as we can offer this as a service.

The following outlines which area's are supported during differing stages. This is a basic overview and in reality, some area's will overlap stages or move according to project needs.

4.1 Support Stages - Early Stage Prototype to MVP

  • Funding and Grants: Through the Project Application process, EVO Labs DAO will allocate funding via milestone mechanisms to assist with prototype development through to MVP. Our grants infrastructure will be utilized to manage and distribute these funds based on community votes and expert evaluations.
  • Open-Source Collaboration: EVO Labs DAO encourage and support the use of open-source methodologies for prototype and MVP development. This not only fosters community involvement but also allows for peer review, access to specialists, technical guidance and oversight by a broader set of experts. Applicants will also have to provide monthly updates for community dissemination.
  • Resource Sharing: Our tech stack will facilitate access to shared resources like labs or specialized equipment through the DAO. Members can contribute or request access to necessary tools for their experiments, or issue a Procurement Request if equipment is not available or in stock.

4.2 Support Stages - Replication

  • Verification and Peer Review: Using the SBT-gated forums for peer review processes, experimenters can present their findings, and the community can engage in or oversee replication efforts to validate results.
  • Community Involvement: Leveraging our communication tools to organize community calls or streams where experiments are demonstrated or discussed live will allow and offer community members to take part in educational sessions on how to replicate experiments.
  • Partner Labs: EVO Labs DAO will partner with various established labs to distribute replicable experiments, methodologies, guides, health and safety, and process documents, to ensure decentralized replication tests. We will utilize Byzantine Fault Tolerance when reviewing replication reports, as well as guarantee replication partners have the adequate equipment needed for testing and replication.

4.3 Support Stages - Commercialization

  • Market Validation: Use the community's collective intelligence to assess market viability of technologies. This will involve surveys, discussions, and funding campaigns within the DAO.
  • IP Management: Develop a clear policy for intellectual property, especially for open-source projects moving towards commercialization. This might involve new tokens or governance structures for managing IP rights.
  • Networking and Partnerships: Utilize networking events, webinars, or direct communications to connect experimenters with potential industry partners, investors, or further funding opportunities.
  • Regulatory Navigation: Offer guidance and resources on navigating regulatory landscapes, combined with educational content and partnerships with legal experts.


4.4 Support Levels - Self Managed

This is suitable for projects being operated by an experienced team or individual.

To self manage, it is advised the team/individual have an understanding of:

  • Project management
  • Budget management
  • H&S management
  • Risk assessing
  • Technical writing (Publications)
  • Team management


4.5 Support Levels - Self Managed with Support

This is suitable for projects being operated by a team or individual with an understanding of what needs to be managed but is unsure where to start. At this level, the DAO Operations team will assist in the setup of processes, checks and documentation requirements. Following setup, the project team will self manage using the provided resources. Initial setup includes:

  • Establish project budget and provide tracking tools
  • Establish key tasks required to reach project milestones
  • Provide information on how to conduct risk assessments
  • Provide guidance on how publications should be approached
  • Connect project team with experts where needed


4.6 Support Levels - Expanded Support

This is suitable for projects being operated by a team or individuals who have little or no experience managing a project. This is also suitable for teams or individuals who would like to focus their efforts on the research and have the operational work carried out by a 3rd party.

In this instance, the DAO would provide the following support:

  • Defining project scope and goals
  • Setting timelines
  • Managing tasks allocation and deadlines
  • Manage project budget and funding milestones
  • Team management
  • Data management and publication
  • Regular risk assessments
  • Deliver project updates to community

5. Features

While it is our desire to be completely decentralized, to get to market in a swifter fashion we have had to utilize some centralized solutions. However, these concessions will ensure we can build a robust and scalable technology stack to ensure secure and efficient operations coupled with seamless User Interface/User Experience (UI/UX). We have considered redundancy solutions for every aspect of our build and should fees increase or we face downtime issues, we have available options which can be harnessed quickly and securely.

We are utilizing the DeFi Lego Block methodology and will bring together multiple dApps to allow DAO members to employ different features and tools.

DAO Community Rubric Vote Interface

5.1 Abstraction and Minting

Abstraction is a key meta in the current blockchain landscape. EVO Labs will be utilizing Account Abstraction and Gas Abstraction from Web3Auth, which will offer a range of benefits.

  • Simplified Onboarding: Web3Auth abstracts away the complexities of managing private keys or seed phrases, which can be daunting for users new to blockchain technology. Also reduces the barrier to entry by allowing users to log in with familiar credentials like social media accounts or email.
  • Enhanced Security: With account abstraction, users can implement features like multi-party computation (MPC) for signing transactions, which means the private key is split into multiple parts, enhancing security. This is crucial for all users, but especially for those less familiar with digital security practices. Secondly, Web3Auth's Multi Factor Authentication (MFA) provides an additional layer of security by requiring more than one form of verification before granting access
  • Flexibility and Recovery: Users can recover their accounts through social recovery mechanisms. This feature is invaluable for less tech-savvy users, ensuring they have a safety net.
  • User-Friendly Transactions:By abstracting gas fees, users don't need to interact with the native blockchain currency (like ETH) for transaction fees. Users can pay in any token or even use fiat through integrated payment systems, making the experience more intuitive for users with less expertise with crypto.
  • Onramp: Those not deeply familiar with cryptocurrency, can struggle with the initial step of acquiring digital currencies. The onramp feature streamlines this process, making it as straightforward as traditional online shopping. Users can select preferred payment methods and convert fiat to cryptocurrency directly on the platform they're engaging with, which reduces the learning curve and technical barriers.
  • Identity and Reputation: SBTs can serve as a way to establish and verify identity or reputation within EVO Labs DAO without the need for traditional, centralized identity systems. This can be particularly appealing across age groups as it provides a decentralized way to prove credentials or membership, which can be used for governance or access to certain DAO functions.
  • Minting: By minting SBTs, EVO Labs can incentivize participation in DAO activities, which can be especially engaging for younger users who might be more active in community-building and looking for ways to demonstrate their involvement. For older users, it provides a clear, manageable way to track their contributions or status within the community.

Implementing Web3Auth for EVO Labs not only improves security and user experience but also democratizes access to blockchain technology, making it viable for a broad demographic spectrum. This should foster greater community engagement and ensure that EVO Labs remains vibrant and inclusive across different age groups.

5.2 Project Management, Grants, and Forum

When looking for a project management solution we also wanted grants and a forum to work alongside each other, with web3 connections to allow DAO voting on chain if needed. This a tall order and only one company offered a solution to this with a ready to use offering, Charmverse. They will be used for the following:

  • Comprehensive Project Management Tools: Charmverse provides an all-in-one workspace that includes document management, task assignments, bounties, proposals, and voting processes. This integration means users don't need to juggle multiple applications or build this from scratch.
  • Simplified User Experience: With features inspired by tools like Notion and Trello, Charmverse's interface is designed to be intuitive. This can help in onboarding users, including those who might not be as tech-savvy or familiar with decentralized technologies, ensuring they can engage with the platform effectively.
  • Token-Gated Access: Charmverse offers token-gated access to privileged materials, forums, and governance processes.
  • Governance and Decision Making: The platform facilitates community governance through its Proposals, allowing for structured discussions, feedback loops, and voting. This can democratize decision-making within the DAO, appealing to users who value having a say in project directions or grant allocations.
  • Grant Management: Charmverse streamlines the grant application and management process, which can be particularly useful for educational or community-building initiatives aimed at engaging users.
  • Community Engagement: The platform supports forums where ideas can be shared, discussed, and developed into proposals. This can foster an inclusive environment where users can contribute, learn, and grow within the community, whether they're tech enthusiasts, new to the scene, or seasoned professionals.

We are using Charmverse as it offers EVO Labs DAO Members web3 features with user-friendly interfaces, making it suitable for a wide age range needed features by promoting engagement, education, and participation in a decentralized organization's activities.

5.3 Notifications, Chat, Video

Using Push.org for notifications, chat, and video within EVO Labs, can offer a myriad of benefits:

  • Decentralized Communication: Push Protocol is built on a decentralized network, which inherently offers better privacy and security than competitors. Users' communications are not stored on centralized servers, reducing the risk of data breaches and unauthorized surveillance.
  • Engagement and Community Building: Push notifications ensure users are always informed about governance proposals, community events, or updates relevant to EVO Labs DAO. This can increase voter turnout and participation in DAOs, which is beneficial for fostering an active community.
  • Chat and Video Features: These tools facilitate direct peer-to-peer communication, which can enhance community interactions, educational sessions, or collaborative projects.
  • User Experience Enhancements: The protocol's gasless feature for sending and receiving notifications means there are no transaction costs for users, making it more accessible and appealing to users who might be deterred by blockchain's typical fee structures.
  • Ease of Use: With an interface that mirrors familiar Web2 experiences, older users who might be less accustomed to Web3 technologies can find the platform intuitive, while younger users benefit from its modern, decentralized approach.
  • Spam Prevention: Push Protocol's built-in mechanisms for spam prevention mean that users receive only relevant communications, reducing notification fatigue and keeping engagement high, which is beneficial for users who might be overwhelmed by digital clutter.
  • Educational and Supportive Tools: The capability to integrate chatbots for customer support or educational purposes can significantly help users, especially those less familiar with blockchain technologies, by providing instant, automated assistance or information.

By leveraging these features, EVO Labs DAO protocol can create a more engaging, secure, and user-friendly environment for a broad audience, enhancing the overall experience and fostering a vibrant community across different age groups.

5.4 On Chain Voting

Implementing Snapshot for on-chain delegated voting with Soul Bound Tokens (SBTs) in EVO Labs can offer several benefits

  • Gasless Voting: Snapshot's off-chain voting mechanism means users do not have to pay gas fees. Results are then broadcast on chain for the Treasury to interact with.
  • Ease of Use: The user interface of Snapshot is designed to be straightforward, making it accessible even to those who might not be as technically savvy, which is crucial for engaging a broad demographic range.
  • Enhanced Governance Participation: Users can delegate their voting rights to others without transferring their tokens, which is facilitated by SBTs.
  • Immutable Records: Although Snapshot voting is off-chain, the results and voter eligibility based on SBTs can be verified on-chain, providing security and transparency. This feature reassures users that their votes are counted correctly without manipulation.
  • Resistance to Sybil Attacks: By using SBTs for voting rights, the DAO can mitigate issues like Sybil attacks where one user could vote multiple times with different addresses, ensuring each vote is from a unique, verified individual.
  • Adaptable Voting Strategies: Snapshot allows for various voting strategies, which can be tailored to different needs.
  • Handle Large-Scale Voting: Snapshot can manage a high volume of votes efficiently. This scalability is key for a user base that might expand significantly over time.

In summary, using Snapshot with SBTs for voting in EVO Labs DAO can enhance user engagement, security, and inclusivity, making governance more democratic and reflective of the community's needs and capabilities.

5.5 Lab Space

Over 2025 the DAO will acquire access to lab space worldwide to ensure experiments have suitable places for independent replications, testing, MVP development, and building commercial products. The DAO will endeavor to partner with protocols offering lab space to enhance the decentralized features of the DAO.

5.6 Publications

Due to the DAO being completely open source with all material, it would be easy for an aggressive company to patent our progress as we are experimenting and publicly disseminating data. As most of the launch projects are based on old patents which we are reimagining with a modern understanding of science and new methodologies, we must ensure that we can continue our work without IP/Patent blockers. Therefore we must publish our work freely and openly in a Journal.

Another significant challenge is if we were to offer our work to a typical Physics Journal they often do not have the required knowledgeable editors and cannot provide the correct editorial oversight. Most Journals do not understand LENR, therefore we must find synergy with those that do.

To overcome this hurdle, the DAO will be establishing a working agreement with a reputable and established Journal within the Condensed Matter Physics space which has editors with incredible experience.

As submitted articles need to be of a certain standard to qualify for editorial oversight (crude experiments will not receive a refereed peer review), the DAO will utilize a pre review methodology where DAO members will be asked to review articles prior to being submitted to an established Journal.

Further, the DAO will release its own yearly physical copy of completed experiments, Journal articles, and any other information.

6. Resiliency

Our aim as a DAO is to be as decentralized and open source as possible, but it is clear that using centralized solutions will get us to market far quicker than building and testing everything from scratch.

6.1 Treasury

evolabsdao.eth: 0xc8654eAF0313Fa702c52000BCf2e38B3339C90B5

The DAO has a multi-chain wallet which acts as our Treasury. We have initially launched on Ethereum, Optimism, Gnosis, Polygon, Polygon ZKEVM, Base, Arbitrum, Celo, and Avalanche chains. We are not limited to any of these chains, and can go live on many more for very little cost.

The Treasury wallet we are using is a smart contract with modular features which operates as a Smart Account.

As the Treasury is modular, Admins can configure it with various modules to add or remove functionalities as needed. These modules can include features for interacting with decentralized applications (dApps), managing assets across different networks, or even integrating with other blockchain protocols. Due to this modularity, the Treasury can:

  • accept donations from any of the above chains. In any currency.
  • only move funds through an on chain Multi-Signature verification for all transactions.
  • swap any tokens it receives for tokens it would like to keep.
  • loan against tokens we decide to keep. At low rates with overcollateralization.
  • stake our tokens and receive passive income.
  • assign a battletested bot to manage the DAO's positions and ensure they never get liquidated.
  • subscribe to a service offering web3 IBAN and USD/EUR/GBP accounts. This could enable the DAO to connect to international banking networks.
  • pay invoices to any fiat bank account, issue invoices in fiat which will be deposited into our treasury account in crypto, and conduct book keeping operations.
  • batch transactions to mint NFTs and distribute them cheaply rather than paying gas for each transaction.
  • integrate our on chain voting mechanic.

The security of the Treasury is fundamentally tied to the blockchain's smart contract execution environment, ensuring that the Treasury's logic for fund management is transparent, immutable, and verifiable by anyone on the network. Our Treasury solution goes beyond traditional private key management, providing Admins with a flexible, secure, and programmable way to manage digital assets with complete DAO oversight.

Five community members have been tasked with being signatories to the Treasury. They cannot move funds without other members say so via a DAO Proposal. To validate and sign a transaction four out of five signatories must sign the message independently. All treasury operations and contract interactions are completely open and transparent.

If a signatory becomes unwell, or cannot perform their duties for extended periods, we will proffer a DAO Proposal to replace them and issue new hardware as and when is needed.

6.2 Open Source Bundling

DAO Community Rubric Vote Interface

The DAO will employ Arweave for long term blockchain based storage to ensure all notes, comments, designs, iterations, articles, and forum posts will be bundled, locked, and stored in long term blockchain based data storage for 200 years.

This will ensure that all designs, schematics, and documentation of all MVPs will be published freely, and openly for anyone to utilize and build upon.

6.3 Decentralized Data Storage

  • Proposed Solutions: IPFS for unencrypted data or web3.storage for encrypted data.
  • Arweave for immutable storage for 200 years of research data, experimental results, and DAO decisions.


6.4 Hosting

  • Fleek is a decentralized hosting solution and we will utilize that for the website.
  • Codebase will be stored and be open source on GitLab with a mirror on Radicle. Both are Open Source, but Radicle is decentralized.


6.5 Dependency Solutions

We must be ready to deploy contingency plans should services cease, as well as plan for further decentralization efforts. Consequently, a modular approach is best.

Web3auth

Dependency: Critical for user authentication, account abstraction, and SBT minting.

Solution: Create DAO owned SBT minting contracts. Utilize an open source and/or decentralized account abstraction and authentication solution - Thirdweb or Biconomy.

Charmverse

Dependency: For grants, forums, and project management.

Solution: Self host our own instance of Charmverse. Or develop/integrate alternative systems that offer similar functionalities, if Charmverse faces downtime or changes terms adversely. Fileverse with a bolted on grants system potentially could work also.

Push

Dependency: For all communication aspects.

Solution: Consider implementing a basic communication layer using open-source solutions like Huddle, Matrix (Element) or XMPP for fallback scenarios.

Snapshot

Dependency: For governance and voting.

Solution: Fork snapshot and host our own fork on IPFS.

7. Legal and Compliance Framework

DAO Community Rubric Vote Interface

7.1 Legal Structure

  • Establishment of an Marshall Islands registered non-profit legal entity to ensure compliance with international regulations
  • Non-profit builds and operates EVO Labs protocol
  • DAO members provide governance and oversight of the non-profit entity
  • There is no equity at all in the DAO non-profit. To issue equity the DAO would need to issue a token

7.2 Intellectual Property and Patents

Research outputs will be published under open licenses, allowing free replication and adaptation. Tangentially, grant funded projects that show progress are rewarded by the DAO and further manufacturing licensing and economic mechanisms can be structured on-chain, giving value to all involved financially, informationally, and physically.

7.3 Risk Mitigation

Threat modeling includes protections against governance attacks, funding fraud, and data loss. Regular audits and backups ensure resilience. Should individuals consistently break Community Rules, their account will be issued a Banned SBT and they will no longer be able to take part in governance of the DAO.

7.4 KYC

Know Your Customer checks will be enforced on all Project Applications and Procurement Requests over a certain value limit. Data will not be stored and the DAO will utilize registered third party service providers.

7.5 Dispute Resolution

In the event that a dispute is raised within the community or DAO itself, the following information serves to outline how that dispute can be resolved by a 3rd party outside of the community or DAO.

Dispute Resolution Process Steps

  1. A member/organization within the community has a dispute with another member/organization or disputes a decision that has been made by the DAO
  2. The dispute cannot be resolved within the community
  3. The party wishing to raise the dispute for arbitration creates a case on Kleros
  4. Kleros Court Process takes place
  5. Results of Kleros case broadcast to DAO community on Charmverse
  6. Dispute is considered resolved and closed by DAO

Kleros Court Process

  1. Case raised
  2. Involved parties notified
  3. Jurors randomly selected
  4. Jurors review dispute and evidence presented
  5. Jurors cast blind vote to determine outcome
  6. Involved parties are notified of the case decision
  7. Results of case are broadcast on chain for record
  8. Case is closed

Appealing a Kleros case outcome

  1. Case results can be appealed on Kleros
  2. Appealed cases go up through a hierarchy of "courts"
  3. Each appeal doubles the previous number of jurors

Costs of bringing a Kleros case

  1. Creating a case has a cost (cost varies by complexity)
  2. Costs are paid using the protocols native token (PNK) and Ethereum (ETH)
  3. Appealing a case result incurs additional costs (which can be crowd funded)

Juror Incentivization

  1. Jurors are incentivized by a rewards system for completing cases
  2. Jurors are rewarded with tokens (PNK and ETH currently)

Juror Voting

  1. Voting is done by blind votes
  2. Juror votes are not revealed until the end of the case when all voting has been completed

Juror Independence

  1. Smart contracts enable personal independence in the sense that no authority can affect the duration of the appointment
  2. Pseudonymity: Jurors are not required to reveal their identity making them less vulnerable to attacks or intimidation

Kleros Transparency

  1. "Kleros' dispute resolution procedure is documented in many places. All crypto economic research is public and the code is open source." - Kleros Whitepaper(1)

Decentralization

  1. The Kleros process is entirely decentralized by way of smart contracts on the GNOSIS blockchain.
  2. The Kleros application can be forked and hosted independently by the DAO if the need arises

Considerations

  1. Kleros is currently in a closed beta for V2
  2. EVO Labs DAO is engaging with Kleros team to further assess suitability and timescales
  3. Should any issues with the platforms viability occur, the dispute resolution process will remain the same and the platform will simply change

8. Funding and Sustainability

8.1 Revenue Streams

  • Donations: Direct contributions to the treasury or specific projects
  • Commercial Partnerships: Licensing agreements for commercialized products and DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network) possibilities
  • AI Agents
  • Liquidity Provision
  • Passive Income via staking
  • Merchandise
  • Publications
  • Project Management As A Service

8.2 Treasury Management

  • Multi-signature wallets with transparent, community-driven fund allocations.
  • Regular reporting on treasury balances, funding decisions, and project milestones.
  • Independent on-chain audit reports will be encouraged and rewarded to ensure Evo-Labs DAO is fully transparent, secure, and decentralized.


8.3 Incentivization and Tokenomics

While EVO Labs DAO is governed by SBTs, the DAO has no equity, or shares owned by anyone. With so many crypto projects launching a token it often symbolizes their equity in the eyes of investors. If the token price goes down, this apparently reflects the company or institution which launched the token. As a DAO we will not offer any of our equity or token until we begin generating revenue.

Once sufficient revenue streams have been established, a Constitutional amendment will be proffered. EVO Labs DAO will launch a token, distribute a certain proportion to the community, potentially some to a liquidity pool, but the vast majority (over 51%) to the DAO.

Consequently, we encourage DAO members to mint and collect SBTs for expertise, donations, or for community interactions. We need you to assist with rubric voting on proposals and delegated votes. We need you to comment in the forum, challenge hypothesis, and offer your peer review of projects, proposals and requests. With this help users will qualify for SBT minting, which in turn will focus the ability of the DAO to reward those who have contributed the most, no matter their skillset or experience.

While we do understand the investment risk is extremely high and the likelihood of a token and positive revenue is years away, to counteract that we believe the upside potential is literally infinite.

9. Current Projects and Roadmap

9.1 Launch Projects

  • Kladov Cavitator: Excess heat noted when running small amounts of water repeatably through the Cavitator. 3D model of patent being converted into a format acceptable for 3D printing so we can observe cavitation (Ultrasonic, Thermo/Photo acoustic, and/or Electro-MHD mechanisms) from outside the perspex housing.
  • Fractal Bagels: Two teams (Holland and Australia) are in development of fractal toroidal energy storage devices using Aharonov–Bohm effect, Casimir effect and localized Sauter–Schwinger effect. The Bagel Game by Zhvirblis establishes the idea, the coils could work as a flux battery, storing vector-potential energy (A-field). If we can get this to run at 60Hz humanity may not need inverters anymore.
  • Project Zeus: Dutch team currently in the process of combining patents from Tesla, Solin and Shoulders to create a direct matter to energy conversion generator. Initial tests have been interesting but better testing equipment needs to be procured.
  • LION: Reinvigorating the work of Neil Gould and focusing on his Ball Lightning reactor, two teams, one in UK and one in Germany, are in the process of rebuilding LION reactors. LION's utilize deuterium doped diamonds in the LENR system and Mr Gould was looking for premises to begin commercial work prior to his death. The DAO has all of his notes, experimental results and data.
  • H2EVO: A highly experienced international team looking at creating "better water" for use especially in agriculture, including vertical farming, hydroponics and fish farming, but not limited to these. Outcomes will focus on mimicking the beneficial effects of artificial fertilizers without associated energy or pollution costs, increase crop yield/protect fish health, and potentially have a role in treating waterways and restoring aquatic biological systems.
  • Hutchinson Replication: An American team is trying to replicate the Hutchinson Effect, in particular the lifting of heavy objects via supposed anti gravity effects, with assistance from highly seasoned experimenters. Initial focus will be on replicating the frequencies and amplitudes of John Hutchison's original equipment. High voltage equipment will need to be built so testing on lighter objects, like aluminum foil can begin before working up to larger objects like the cannon ball John Hutchison has video of levitating. The team will be combining as many high voltage AC, high voltage DC, RF, acoustic, microwaves, magnetic fields, light, heat, spark gaps, etc. to try to determine what in John Hutchison's setup was creating the antigravity effect of heavy objects.
  • Windhexe: Based on the Polifka patent, the Windhexe utilizes a high pressure vortex airflow (with steam injection for drying) which creates a material grinding process. Inspired by Schauberger, Keeley and Tesla, the Dutch team focused on this project is reinterpreting Frank Polifkas Windhexe by building an open source version using their 3D design background for engineering projects. The aim is to create a material grinding and drying apparatus with the aid of the MFMP community, to hopefully have a MVP which is actually a large-scale practical application of the Fractal Toroidal Moment. For more info see windhexe.com.
  • LENR AI: RAG model AI which will answer all LENR/EVO/Physics questions. Od1exx has been building the LENR AI Bot for some time, creating a LENR-wiki.com, and a LENR 101 course for educating users on the history, names, and concepts starting in the late 19th century with tesla.
  • ULTR: First replication kit which will be distributed by the DAO showing EVO creation in a ultrasonic cleaner. The ULTR experiment is a simplified replication of the work done over 30 years by various researchers in the LENR community. It has been conducted by scores of people worldwide and always produces the same effects, making it a valuable replication tool for the LENR community. The DAO seeks to use ULTR to establish an on-demand, repeatable LENR experiment with diagnostic evidence that is convincing to the wider scientific community. The ULTR experiment seeks to prove the capabilities of LENR and provide a cost-effective and straightforward method for demonstrating its effectiveness.
  • Project Timeline: An open source and free to use interactive timeline to allow researchers to see discoveries, patents, videos, and articles which are often hard to find or obscured behind paywalls. An international team, led by an American is building a comprehensive knowledge graph for low energy nuclear reactions (LENR), integrating unstructured data from sources like MFMP videos and documents, along with other databases, to create a single source of truth encompassing the last 200 years of research. This knowledge graph will not only serve as a foundational resource for AI applications, wikis, and educational materials but also provide direct value to researchers by streamlining access to and analysis of existing knowledge.


9.2 2025 Roadmap

DAO Community Rubric Vote Interface

During Q1 we will focus on bringing the community together to test our Beta with live votes and active funding. We, as a community, will establish and ratify our Constitution and Community Rules. They will be key supporting documents in our LLC incorporation, and act as our fallback document in case of disputes, challenges, or oversights.

By Q2 the Bug Hunting and Gov testing will be in full flow. We will investigate ways we can automate as much as possible within the DAO, with the aim to establish procedures and processes to automate the following:

  • SBT minting approval;
  • application process checks;
  • procurement checks;
  • DAO community proposals;
  • legal;
  • KYC/AML checks;
  • bundling to arweave; and
  • any other process which involves a DAO member's contribution.

Further, we will ascertain whether we need to continue with our decentralization efforts: Can we run our own self hosted instance of charmverse/snapshot; and can we use an open source onboarding solution to replicate and replace web3auth? While it is beneficial to continue our mission to decentralize as much as we possibly can, whether we can actually do so is another matter. We will also be sending out replication kits or schematics and plans to reproduction and replication partners. Lastly, members of the DAO will be in Japan for ICCF 26.

Q3 will bring projects the opportunity to begin their article or paper preparations for our Journal release. We will source and onboard partners who focus on manufacturing and go to market. We will investigate whether we need further privacy options for the DAO and the community.

If we do need more privacy options, this will be implemented in Q4. We will also aim to release our first Journal.

10. Call to Action

EVO-Labs DAO invites investors, philanthropists, researchers, developers, engineers, and enthusiasts to join our mission to decentralize and democratize the next wave of scientific discovery. United, we can build a resilient and thriving ecosystem. One that empowers humanity to unlock the potential of abundant energy and new physical understandings of nature's grand design. As a species we must evolve past our instinct to profit and control natures bounty to the detriment of others, therefore we must be magnanimous, altruistic, and compassionate in our endeavor. We ask you to join us in trying to make a better future for all our children and grandchildren.

Get Involved

Website: EvoLabs

Email: info@evo-labs.io